The Giving Three

Conspiracy Hypothesis

There is a book in Japanese called “Man who did the truth of Kennedy in 2039” by Nobuhiko OCHIAI. The author talks about the assassination of John F. Kennedy that had taken place on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, America. The president of America was assassinated before people’s very eyes in the parade, and according to the official investigation done by the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy known unofficially as the Warren Commission, which was established by President Lyndon B. Johnson on November 29, 1963 to investigate the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy, the president seems to be shot by a man called “Lee Harvey Oswald” alone. However we can’t prove it today because this man was also assassinated before police’s very eyes by “Jack Ruby”, who died in a jail 4 years later by cancer. If you have a chance to study about the assassination, you’ll encounter many strange “facts”.

And it is obvious that this assassination was well planned and executed by some group of people and without the power (or help) of FBI and police, it wouldn’t have been completed. Although I don’t know about the truth of this case, when I red that book, I realized that the president of the United States doesn’t have the supreme authority in America and the existence of people who have the power to murder a president of USA in front of citizens. Isn’t that surprising facts that the president of the United States of America is not the head of the country and rather can be killed so easily? And the Commission records, which were transferred to the National Archives, were partially published and some portion of the records was sealed for 75 years (to 2039) under a general National Archive policy in order to protect innocent people who could be damaged by their relationship with participants in the case (though 98% of the records had been released by 1992). It’s very sure to me that a conspiracy exists behind it, so you might say, “It’s a conspiracy theory.”

It you speak out an idea that is NOT broadcasted on TV and printed on newspaper or textbooks, some people criticize the idea by labeling as “a conspiracy theory” and ordinary people believe it without thinking. As for me, I don’t want to believe subjective and selective information from mass media and textbooks used at schools straightaway, because I’ve ever found many inconsistencies and contradictions in it. I always try to examine any information with objective views and never throw away any slight possibilities unless they are completely denied with objective perspective and without political intensions. Isn’t that too easy to say “Oh, it’s a conspiracy theory” and finish it?

By the way, what’s the difference between Theory and Hypothesis? According to the Collins COBUILD dictionary, a Theory is “1. a formal idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain something, 2. If you have a theory about something, you have your own opinion about it which you cannot prove but which you think is true”, and a Hypothesis is “an idea which is suggested as a possible explanation for a particular situation or condition, but which has not yet been proved to be correct”. As you can see, what’s in common is that both are not necessarily telling the truth, in other words a hypothesis can be true and a theory can be true. Yet to avoid such a criticism, I call it “Conspiracy Hypothesis”. The thing is, people finalize it without thinking and even checking it. Please be sure that all theories proved by great scientists used to be hypotheses at the beginning.

According to some people or group of people called “Revisionists” like Bishop Richard Williamson, the Holocaust, the genocide of Jews, can be interpreted in a completely different manner. I don’t know the truth, but I don’t deny any possibilities unless it is proved. Both can be possible. And in America today, a lot of people have started claiming that the September11 attacks (so-called 9/11) was an internal job done by those who control the administration of the United States of America, which is called “9/11 Truth movement”. And there is another one called “Moon landing conspiracy theories”, which claim that some or all elements of the Apollo program and the associated Moon landings were hoaxes made by NASA and members of other organizations. As far as I listen to its explanations, I think it’s convincing and believable enough to examine and study further. But people don’t study, even just look at some page on the Internet and judge it as a conspiracy theory.

On the other hand, as a matter of fact, the copyright for Mickey Mouse was supposed to expire in 2003, but the Walt Disney Company lobbied extensively and they’ve got the extension of 20 years for it, which is called “Copyright Term Extension Act”. And the Federal Reserve Act, which granted FRB, which is a private company, the legal authority to issue National Reserve Note, namely U.S. dollar, was supposed to expire, but it still exists. As I mentioned before, “white people” change rules for their profit; in other words rules does exist to satisfy “white people”. My question is why those who criticize Revisionism, 9/11 Truth movement, or other “conspiracy theories” that they call, don’t criticize the Copyright Term Extension Act and the Federal Reserve Act? Because these Acts are not “theories” but real conspiracies? If so, my insistence wouldn’t be criticized because I call it “Conspiracy Hypothesis”. Why do they criticize it? For it’s the truth? Or to hide real conspiracies? Anyway I believe that the Roots of conspiracy and “International Development” would be the same.