Conspiracy Hypothesis

 

There is a book in Japanese called “Man who did the truth of Kennedy in 2039” by Nobuhiko OCHIAI. The author talks about the assassination of John F. Kennedy that had taken place on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, America. The president of America was assassinated before people’s very eyes in the parade, and according to the official investigation done by the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy known unofficially as the Warren Commission, which was established by President Lyndon B. Johnson on November 29, 1963 to investigate the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy, the president seems to be shot by a man called “Lee Harvey Oswald” alone. However we can’t prove it today because this man was also assassinated before police’s very eyes by “Jack Ruby”, who died in a jail 4 years later by cancer. If you have a chance to study about the assassination, you’ll encounter many strange “facts”.

And it is obvious that this assassination was well planned and executed by some group of people and without the power (or help) of FBI and police, it wouldn’t have been completed. Although I don’t know about the truth of this case, when I red that book, I realized that the president of the United States doesn’t have the supreme authority in America and the existence of people who have the power to murder a president of USA in front of citizens. Isn’t that surprising facts that the president of the United States of America is not the head of the country and rather can be killed so easily? And the Commission records, which were transferred to the National Archives, were partially published and some portion of the records was sealed for 75 years (to 2039) under a general National Archive policy in order to protect innocent people who could be damaged by their relationship with participants in the case (though 98% of the records had been released by 1992). It’s very sure to me that a conspiracy exists behind it, so you might say, “It’s a conspiracy theory.”

It you speak out an idea that is NOT broadcasted on TV and printed on newspaper or textbooks, some people criticize the idea by labeling as “a conspiracy theory” and ordinary people believe it without thinking. As for me, I don’t want to believe subjective and selective information from mass media and textbooks used at schools straightaway, because I’ve ever found many inconsistencies and contradictions in it. I always try to examine any information with objective views and never throw away any slight possibilities unless they are completely denied with objective perspective and without political intensions. Isn’t that too easy to say “Oh, it’s a conspiracy theory” and finish it?

By the way, what’s the difference between Theory and Hypothesis? According to the Collins COBUILD dictionary, a Theory is “1. a formal idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain something, 2. If you have a theory about something, you have your own opinion about it which you cannot prove but which you think is true”, and a Hypothesis is “an idea which is suggested as a possible explanation for a particular situation or condition, but which has not yet been proved to be correct”. As you can see, what’s in common is that both are not necessarily telling the truth, in other words a hypothesis can be true and a theory can be true. Yet to avoid such a criticism, I call it “Conspiracy Hypothesis”. The thing is, people finalize it without thinking and even checking it. Please be sure that all theories proved by great scientists used to be hypotheses at the beginning.  

According to some people or group of people called “Revisionists” like Bishop Richard Williamson, the Holocaust, the genocide of Jews, can be interpreted in a completely different manner. I don’t know the truth, but I don’t deny any possibilities unless it is proved. Both can be possible. And in America today, a lot of people have started claiming that the September11 attacks (so-called 9/11) was an internal job done by those who control the administration of the United States of America, which is called “9/11 Truth movement”. And there is another one called “Moon landing conspiracy theories”, which claim that some or all elements of the Apollo program and the associated Moon landings were hoaxes made by NASA and members of other organizations. As far as I listen to its explanations, I think it’s convincing and believable enough to examine and study further. But people don’t study, even just look at some page on the Internet and judge it as a conspiracy theory.  

On the other hand, as a matter of fact, the copyright for Mickey Mouse was supposed to expire in 2003, but the Walt Disney Company lobbied extensively and they’ve got the extension of 20 years for it, which is called “Copyright Term Extension Act”. And the Federal Reserve Act, which granted FRB, which is a private company, the legal authority to issue National Reserve Note, namely U.S. dollar, was supposed to expire, but it still exists. As I mentioned before, “white people” change rules for their profit; in other words rules does exist to satisfy “white people”. My question is why those who criticize Revisionism, 9/11 Truth movement, or other “conspiracy theories” that they call, don’t criticize the Copyright Term Extension Act and the Federal Reserve Act? Because these Acts are not “theories” but real conspiracies? If so, my insistence wouldn’t be criticized because I call it “Conspiracy Hypothesis”. Why do they criticize it? For it’s the truth? Or to hide real conspiracies? Anyway I believe that the Roots of conspiracy and “International Development” would be the same.

Reference in YouTube:

Bishop Richard Williamson - Gas Chambers, Anti-Semitism and the Truth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6C9BuXe2RM

911 Truth Loose change 2nd edition 9/11 Documentary Full length:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z__4ZhF36Mc

THE Moon Landing Hoax (Full documentary):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW4_5kAPzb0

Monopoly Men (1999) The Fed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biCbUFrbLv8

Presidency in Africa

Why are there many presidents in Africa? This is the question I want to ask today. I’m not talking about academic matters, but more conspiratorial perspective here. There’d be explanations and theories for it, but why presidency? My answer is simple, “Because a president can have more power on affairs of country”. So why should it be more powerful than other political forms? My answer is simple, “Because it’s easy to control a country from outside. Namely all you need to do is to control a president in order to control a country”. Presidency in Africa is the symbol of neo-imperialism to my eyes. Independence, president, development, democracy, they’re all beautiful words but in reality “they” exploit Africa in the name of independent; “they” rob Africa in the name of president; “they” destroy Africa in the name of development, and “they” trick Africa in the name of democracy.  

Nigeria is the biggest country of producing oil in Africa, but unbelievably there is no oil refinery in the country so they must buy petrol from “them”. Why the president of Nigeria doesn’t make a refinery? My answer is simple because he’s an agent sent by “them”. Or why western countries don’t help Nigeria make a refinery? My answer is simple because the West doesn’t want Africa to have power in any economical activities. Or why any external commercial refinery companies don’t make a refinery in Nigeria? My answer is simple because someone interferes to make an oil refinery with invisible power, which would never come out to mass media and textbooks. If there were an oil refinery in Nigeria, its neighboring countries would profit from it to a great degree. But it won’t happen, because it means that some western countries lose their market in Africa. Therefore “they” need their branches and branch managers to control internal affairs in the name of “president”.

And when western countries make an international trade treaty with developing countries, they try to sign it in the form of “bilateral treaty”, which is a treaty strictly between two state parties, and in which they can easily manipulate decision making with the power of money and politics. On the other hand, there is another form of treaty called “Multilateralism”, in which three or more organizations or countries collaborate to solve issues. Needless to say, it can be more powerful and profitable if all power is harmonized, but there would be much possibility of discussion and opposition in the process of decision making. If you have some bad intension in your mind, which would you choose bilateralism or multilateralism? Do you want to talk about your conspiracy with others? In bilateral treaty, all you need to do is to bribe a president in the name of international development.

Let me briefly talk about the case of Zimbabwe. When this country got its independence in 1980, it was called “The most blessed independence in Africa”. The both, large-scale farms owned by white people and small-scale farms owned by black people, had high productivity and its agricultural base was almost perfect. Agricultural products were exported to neighboring countries; literacy rate was more than 90%; there were large-scale industrial cities; mineral resources were so affluent; and railways and roads were well-built etc. However Robert Mugabe became the president of Zimbabwe and things changed drastically in a bad manner. And on June 26, 2006, he declared in his speech like the following: “This extreme rise in prices is a conspiracy of British. We must resist. In order to protect the life of citizens, companies and shops must sell all products in half price. I’ll nationalize all the businesses that don’t comply.” As a result, inflation rate rose up to 160,000% at maximum and domestic economy was completely destroyed. Did he protect citizens with it? Some might say that it’s because of his greediness, but why did he need to destroy agricultural base too by sending former guerrillas to farms? He could exploit from them if his intension was only for his greediness. So who really profits from devastation of African countries? My answer is the western counties that export products to Africa. In short, he oppressed the life of citizens and helped western countries.

This is my conspiratorial delusion. If Mugabe was bred by the hand of western countries secretly and sent back to become a president in the name of democratic election, which is controlled by someone, everything goes well for “them” who control western countries. Corruption, bribe, and devastation in Africa seem to be caused by selfishness and greediness of African presidents, but if they are all friends of western countries and share the wealth of Africa with “them”, all strange phenomena can be explained very easily and logically. In 2008, Robert Mugabe was re-elected as the president of Zimbabwe and when Africa Summit in the same year, he stated “If a leader of African country criticizes me as “non-democratic”, I’ll check how democratic his election was.” What does it mean? Doesn’t it imply that my delusion is right? This is the real character of presidency in Africa.

 

 

 

 

Crank up – “Walk Together”

Finally, finally, and finally, I could finish shooting for the film “Walk Together” the other day. I really thank my students and teachers who acted in scenes and helped us for the film. Without the help of others, I wouldn’t be about to complete my duty. And also I can’t help feeling that God assisted us because in the original stories that students brought me, there were a couple of hearing boys appearing on the stage. However we are all deaf except teachers so practically it wasn’t very possible for us to make it, but what surprised me was that at the beginning of this term new young hearing teachers were assigned to our school, needless to say students didn’t know that they were coming. And they came to us and students bought the stories with hearing boys and we made the film. What is that? You may say “it’s by accident”. Yes, it would be true. Or you may say “Lucky!” Oh, very right. Or you may say “It’s God’s will”. Well, I don’t belong to any religious organization or institute, but I have my own religious sense in my mind and can’t help feeling that it was God who sent us the young hearing teachers to our school for the film and made me work on this film. Although I took the role of “Director”, I didn’t feel that “I” made it and in truth I would be just a marionette of God. Namely I acted as a director in the film called “Making the film: Walk Together”.

And on the other hand, it was really tough days for me. In Ghana, everything is not organized and people are not punctual at all, and what’s worse, people don’t keep promise, saying “sick”, “forgot”, “another work” etc. I would say that it was a kind of miracle to finish shooting with them within the time given. I talked to a new hearing teacher about the film and his role and explained what he would do in each scene with the document of scenes in order to get his agreement and he accepted it. But a week later he came to me and said that he didn’t want to act because he was supposed to say “I love you”. Needless to say, I explained about it and he agreed to that but he said he didn’t want to say it. I was really surprised and a bit angry but I persuaded him anyway. Everything was set up and shooting had started then, how could I explain it to my students and cancel making the film?   

And another hearing teacher didn’t show up to the school on a shooting day, though I promised with him about the shooting in the previous day. When I called him, he said “sick”. I knew that he hadn’t been very well, but it was very obvious that he picked up my call outside because of the noise that I heard on the call. I would stay at home to rest when sick, but he might pick it up on his way to hospital. However he could’ve called me in the morning if he went to hospital. I prepared everything and waited for him, but suddenly I had to cancel the shooting on that day due to his “sickness”. There were some other difficulties with them in shooting. However it doesn’t mean that they’re incapable or incompetent or inferior, they’re not used to such organized behaviors for a project with other people. In Ghana everyone is easygoing; no one has sense of time; everything is unorganized, and people don’t notice that they’re all being lazy in the sense of developed countries. So I can’t complaint to them; they just acted as ordinary Ghanaians. It was nice reminisces with them now.

My students did a really good job in acting, shooting, and editing. Basically I got them to work all the processes to make a film because it’s a part of education and it’ll be a good experience for their future. I really enjoyed myself in shooting with them and now it is placed in the album of my heart. Yesterday students have all gone home for a vacation and I completed all my duties. I’ll leave here on Monday and arrive in Japan on December 25, 2013. Thank you all and I thank the God of Ghana.

 

Narcotic Business Model

Well, as I mentioned before, you must understand the mechanism of Economy, Politics, and History, which are interrelated each other as I’ve explained so far. Today let me talk about a fact of Economy. When you engage in an economical activity, you would seek for a way of making money easily and quickly and if it’s eternity protected by law, you’d be much happier. This would be the eternal desire of human in economical activities. Surprisingly enough there’s such a business model existing.

There is a factory of mine in Africa and on the same site of the factory there is another factory where “they” make artificial legs. When the owner of the mine factory sells mines, he/she can make money, and when people who lost their legs come to make artificial legs, he/she can make money again. And this cycle continues as long as mines generate patients. What a nice business! And more surprisingly, the owner of the 2 factories is the same person. I call it “Narcotic Business Model”. However I can’t participate in this business because I don’t have either the mentality of Killing or the power to deceive people lawfully, which are the necessities for this business model. Normally illegal activities are involved in this business model and laws can be a shelter for them. You remember Nkrumah’s words: “the enemy is intangible, invisible and impersonal, (…) Imperialism and colonialism die hard” In the past bad acts were visible but “they” never show their trick today.

Imagine that you have a share in market of anti-virus software and knowledge to program virus, would you like to spread the virus that you made in order to sell your anti-virus software? Imagine that you want a share of medicine and have knowledge to make diseases, would you like to spread the disease that you made in order to sell your medicine? Actually this business happened in Japan. In 1980s, “Green Cross　Corporation” sold HIV-tainted blood and two thousand haemophilia patients in Japan contracted HIV via tainted blood products. You must understand that destruction of other people, things and places is a business chance for some people. The thing is, some people make such situations on purpose by the power of politics. That’s why War is always welcomed by some people.

Similarly, if you write your name on a piece of paper and can sell it, would you like to join the business? Yes, you would. You get money by just writing something, why not? Believe it or not, the government of the United States of America doesn’t have the right to issue their bills (notes) of currency ($ dollar), which is protected by the law of America, but FRB (Federal Reserve Bank) does, which is a private company owned by Jewish bankers. Namely America must pay certain amount of money to a group of people to get its own bills. And the income tax, which is not reasonable at all to me, started to pay the money for it in 1913. In short, citizens of America are unconsciously imposed to present their money to “them” by the law. This story is detailed in “MonopolyMen” available on Youtube. The law of America is a shelter for monopoly men to make money and hide themselves.

And have you ever heard Military-IndustrialComplex? War is a tool for those who control America to make money and it is said that America needs a war every 10-year to sustain their economy due to the Military-Industrial Complex. I briefly talked about the meaning of “subsidized agricultural products” for Western countries, and weapons are also important exporting articles for America and some European countries like British, France, Germany, Russia... War never occurs naturally, but does with the will of the Narcotic Business Model and mentality of Killing. And people would never doubt whatever happens in war, saying “Because it’s war”. War is just a tool for this business model.